![]() ![]() ![]() Those who’ve voiced concerns about affirmative action need to also take on legacy and wealth-based admissions.Īfter all, defenders of affirmative action have a point when they argue that legacy admissions give special treatment to the already-advantaged. Their admissions practices need to comport with federal law.Ī Court ruling to that effect, though, would only address one of the ways in which college admissions practices play favorites and stifle opportunity. Harvard and UNC collect huge sums of federal funding each year. Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act states: “No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.” It’s time for the Court to decide whether the law of the land means what it says. Ind.,” and “I don’t think I can admit or defer this brown girl.” The UNC case, surfaced online messages in which a college admissions staff wrote things like, “I just opened a brown girl who’s an 810 ,” “I am reading an Am. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |